Franchising & scaling

We help restaurant concepts prepare operations, menus, kitchens, standards and training for multiple locations — without losing quality, pace or identity.

Contact us nowView collaboration models

Franchising & scaling

When a strong restaurant concept needs to be repeatable

A restaurant concept is ready for franchising or scaling when it can be delivered consistently by multiple teams, across multiple locations and under real operating conditions. Gastroplan helps turn experience, routines and quality into an operating model that can be repeated — for new openings, relaunches and growing restaurant groups.

What the process can include

From restaurant concept to scalable operations

A franchising or scaling process is built around your current operation, the maturity of the concept and the ambition for future locations. It can include:

Concept and positioning

We clarify the concept identity, target audience, value proposition and market position so new locations can deliver the same guest experience without losing direction.

Menu and product structure

We standardise menus, recipes, portions, product mix and quality levels so the kitchen can deliver consistently across multiple locations.

Kitchen flow and equipment

We work with stations, mise en place, production, equipment and capacity so the operation can perform in different spaces and during busy service.

SOPs, manuals and standards

We turn routines and operational experience into practical procedures, operating manuals and quality standards that teams can use every day.

Onboarding, training and roles

We create a clear model for onboarding, role allocation, training and management so new teams can reach the required standard faster.

Openings and quality assurance

We can support planning, implementation, testing, new-location openings and follow-up so new units start stronger and maintain standards after launch.

We do not only prepare the concept on paper

The focus is on making the solution work in day-to-day operations: during busy service, with new team members, in different spaces and with a consistent guest experience. We work across kitchen, service, purchasing, training and standards as one operational task — not as disconnected documents.

Individual scope

A scaling process tailored to your operating model

Franchising and scaling are always individual projects. Scope is agreed based on number of locations, current operations, concept maturity, timeline, responsibilities and the deliverables that genuinely need to be in place.

Additional locations, formats and openings are agreed specifically as part of the individual scope.

Supplier negotiation and purchasing optimisation usually cover up to five suppliers unless otherwise agreed in writing.

Legal franchise agreements, corporate structure advice and legal counsel are not part of Gastroplan's deliverables.

Process

How we prepare your concept for multiple locations

01

Concept and potential

We clarify the concept, the business goals, the current operation and what needs to be in place before the next location.

02

Operations and standards

We analyse workflow, quality, kitchen flow, roles and bottlenecks to identify what needs to be standardised.

03

Scope and implementation plan

We define deliverables, responsibilities, priorities and a realistic implementation plan for the next phase.

04

Implementation and follow-up

We help turn the plan into operational routines, training and standards that can be applied across locations.

Should your concept work in multiple locations?

Contact us with a short description of the concept, the current operation and your plans. We will assess what needs to be in place before the next location, restaurant group expansion or franchise process.

Contact us now

Scale a proven operation, not an untested idea

A restaurant is ready to scale when its economics, menu, quality, workflows, staffing and guest experience can be delivered without constant dependence on the founder. Popularity alone is not proof that the model can be repeated.

We review revenue, contribution, food cost, labour, capacity, investment and sensitivity together with recipes, suppliers, equipment, training, food safety, reporting and quality control. The operating manual is built from real work, tested with staff and updated as new locations reveal practical issues.

A pilot location or controlled test should expose weaknesses in menu, training, suppliers, reporting and opening procedures before a wider rollout. The objective is consistent core quality with clearly defined areas where local adaptation is allowed.

Related cases and insights

Case studyConcept, menu and operational structure at MotleyRead more →InsightWhen others operate your restaurant conceptRead more →InsightTesting a restaurant concept through street foodRead more →

FAQ

It should have stable, documented operations that can be delivered without constant founder involvement. Economics, menu, quality, workflows, staffing and guest experience must be repeatable. Popularity on its own is not evidence of scalability.

We review revenue, contribution, food cost, labour, capacity, investment and sensitivity together with menu, production, suppliers, staffing, training, equipment, quality control and dependence on key individuals.

The elements that protect guest experience, quality, safety and economics should be clear: recipes, portions, purchasing, equipment, service, food safety, opening and closing, cleaning and reporting. Standardisation should define where local adaptation is allowed rather than create unnecessary rigidity.

It describes tasks, responsibilities, sequence and quality standards in a form people can actually use. It should be built from the real operation, tested with staff and updated when new locations reveal better methods or missing information.

Not necessarily. Core products, quality and recognition may need to remain stable, while season, market, kitchen or suppliers can justify variation. The system should define mandatory elements, optional elements and how new dishes are approved.

We define practical competency goals for onboarding, trainers, service and production, then use observation, tests and follow-up. Documents are not sufficient on their own; managers must see the work and provide feedback.

No. Premises differ. Critical operating principles, minimum capacity and approved alternatives can be standardised, but copying one drawing can create new problems. Layout must still support menu, flow, safety and revenue at the individual site.

Quality requires clear standards, training, measurement and follow-up. Recipes and procedures should be supported by checks on taste, temperature, portion, waiting time and guest feedback. Deviations should lead to learning and corrective action.

Yes. A pilot can reveal weaknesses in the menu, training, suppliers, reporting and opening process. Its goals and learning points should be defined in advance, and the manuals should be updated before further expansion.

The price depends on the concept's maturity, existing processes, documentation, testing and level of implementation. A maturity review is different from a complete manual, training programme and opening support. We define phases, deliverables, responsibilities and price after a non-binding clarification.